Kerris Radanovich -v- Department of Education
Document Type: Order
Matter Number: U 1/2024
Matter Description: Unfair Dismissal Application
Industry: Education
Jurisdiction: Single Commissioner
Member/Magistrate name: Commissioner C Tsang
Delivery Date: 26 Mar 2024
Result: Application dismissed
Citation: 2024 WAIRC 00136
WAIG Reference:
UNFAIR DISMISSAL APPLICATION
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
PARTIES KERRIS RADANOVICH
APPLICANT
-V-
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
RESPONDENT
CORAM COMMISSIONER C TSANG
DATE TUESDAY, 26 MARCH 2024
FILE NO. U 1 OF 2024
CITATION NO. 2024 WAIRC 00136
Result Application dismissed
Representation
APPLICANT MS K RADANOVICH (ON HER OWN BEHALF)
RESPONDENT MR M MCILWAINE (OF COUNSEL)
Order
WHEREAS on 4 January 2024, the applicant filed a Form 2 – Unfair Dismissal Application (Form 2);
AND WHEREAS on 22 January 2024, the respondent filed a Form 2A – Employer Response to Unfair Dismissal Application, raising the jurisdictional objection that the applicant, as a government officer within the meaning of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) by virtue of her employment as a public servant, falls outside the Commission’s jurisdiction (Jurisdictional Objection);
AND WHEREAS on 21 February 2024, the Jurisdictional Objection was listed for a Directions Hearing, and during the hearing, the applicant agreed the Commission lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the Form 2, and consequently the applicant was given until 7 March 2024 to either discontinue the proceedings or seek leave to amend the Form 2 to align with the Commission’s jurisdiction;
AND WHEREAS on 11 March 2024, the Commission wrote to the applicant extending the time for the applicant to discontinue the proceedings or seek leave to amend the Form 2 to 25 March 2024, and informing the applicant that if she opted not to pursue either option by 25 March 2024 that the Commission would dismiss the proceedings for reasons including that it is an abuse of process to maintain the proceedings where they are ‘foredoomed to fail’ as outlined in Walton v Gardiner [1993] 177 CLR 378;
AND WHEREAS on 25 March 2024, the applicant indicated a preference for the proceedings to conclude, and consequently the Commission wrote to the applicant requesting confirmation of the applicant’s preference for the proceedings to be discontinued or dismissed, and the applicant confirmed her understanding that the proceedings would be dismissed;
NOW THEREFORE, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred under the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA), hereby orders –
THAT application U 1 of 2024 is dismissed on grounds of want of jurisdiction and abuse of process.
COMMISSIONER C TSANG
UNFAIR DISMISSAL APPLICATION
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
PARTIES Kerris Radanovich
APPLICANT
-v-
Department of Education
RESPONDENT
CORAM Commissioner C Tsang
DATE Tuesday, 26 March 2024
FILE NO. U 1 OF 2024
CITATION NO. 2024 WAIRC 00136
Result Application dismissed
Representation
Applicant Ms K Radanovich (on her own behalf)
Respondent Mr M McIlwaine (of counsel)
Order
WHEREAS on 4 January 2024, the applicant filed a Form 2 – Unfair Dismissal Application (Form 2);
AND WHEREAS on 22 January 2024, the respondent filed a Form 2A – Employer Response to Unfair Dismissal Application, raising the jurisdictional objection that the applicant, as a government officer within the meaning of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) by virtue of her employment as a public servant, falls outside the Commission’s jurisdiction (Jurisdictional Objection);
AND WHEREAS on 21 February 2024, the Jurisdictional Objection was listed for a Directions Hearing, and during the hearing, the applicant agreed the Commission lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the Form 2, and consequently the applicant was given until 7 March 2024 to either discontinue the proceedings or seek leave to amend the Form 2 to align with the Commission’s jurisdiction;
AND WHEREAS on 11 March 2024, the Commission wrote to the applicant extending the time for the applicant to discontinue the proceedings or seek leave to amend the Form 2 to 25 March 2024, and informing the applicant that if she opted not to pursue either option by 25 March 2024 that the Commission would dismiss the proceedings for reasons including that it is an abuse of process to maintain the proceedings where they are ‘foredoomed to fail’ as outlined in Walton v Gardiner [1993] 177 CLR 378;
AND WHEREAS on 25 March 2024, the applicant indicated a preference for the proceedings to conclude, and consequently the Commission wrote to the applicant requesting confirmation of the applicant’s preference for the proceedings to be discontinued or dismissed, and the applicant confirmed her understanding that the proceedings would be dismissed;
NOW THEREFORE, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred under the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA), hereby orders –
THAT application U 1 of 2024 is dismissed on grounds of want of jurisdiction and abuse of process.
Commissioner C Tsang