Allan Raymond Carlyon v Commissioner of Police
Document Type: Order
Matter Number: APPL 1721/2003
Matter Description: The decision of the Commissioner of Police to take removal actionrelating to the appellant was harsh, oppressive or unfair
Industry:
Jurisdiction: Commission in Court Session
Member/Magistrate name: Commission in Court Session Chief Commissioner W S Coleman Senior Commissioner A R Beech Commissioner P E Scott
Delivery Date: 4 May 2004
Result:
Citation: 2004 WAIRC 11363
WAIG Reference: 84 WAIG 1250
100422651
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
PARTIES ALLAN RAYMOND CARLYON
APPLICANT
-V-
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
RESPONDENT
CORAM CHIEF COMMISSIONER W S COLEMAN
SENIOR COMMISSIONER A R BEECH
COMMISSIONER P E SCOTT
DATE TUESDAY, 4 MAY 2004
FILE NO/S APPLICATION 1721 OF 2003
CITATION NO. 2004 WAIRC 11363
_______________________________________________________________________________
Result Order issued
Representation
APPLICANT MS M RIDLEY (OF COUNSEL) ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT
RESPONDENT MR R BATHURST (OF COUNSEL) ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Order
HAVING HEARD Mr R Bathurst (of counsel) for the Commissioner of Police and Ms M Ridley (of counsel) for the appellant in the matter of the application by the Commissioner of Police for leave to tender new evidence, the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to section 33R(2)(b) of the Police Act 1892 hereby grants leave for the following evidence to be tendered in Appeal No. 1721 of 2003:
(a) transcript of the criminal trial of the Appellant for assault occasioning bodily harm, heard on 15 September, 18 September, 19 September and 8 December 2003; and
(b) reasons of Magistrate Cullen, dated 10 December 2003, for convicting the Appellant of assault occasioning bodily harm.
FURTHRMORE pursuant to section 33S of the Police Act 1892 whereby the terms of section 35 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1979 have application, the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission determines that the reasons for decision in the determination of the application to grant leave to tender new evidence will be handed down the day after the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission has determined the appellants application for leave to tender new evidence. That matter will be heard at 4.30pm Thursday 6th May 2004.
THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION will then consider whether, given that the hearing of the appeal pursuant to section 33Q of the Police Act 1892 has been set down to commence on 11th May 2004:
(i) there is sufficient opportunity for the appellant to consider the new evidence for which leave has been given to the Commissioner of Police to tender and for the appellant to tender new evidence in response to that new evidence pursuant to section 33R(5) of the Police Act 1892; and
(ii) any consideration which may arise as a consequence of the determination on Thursday 6th May of the appellant’s application for leave to tender new evidence pursuant to section 33R(3) of the Police Act 1892.
ON BEHALF OF THE
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
100422651
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
PARTIES ALLAN RAYMOND CARLYON
APPLICANT
-v-
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
RESPONDENT
CORAM CHIEF COMMISSIONER W S COLEMAN
SENIOR COMMISSIONER A R BEECH
COMMISSIONER P E SCOTT
DATE TUESDAY, 4 MAY 2004
FILE NO/S APPLICATION 1721 OF 2003
CITATION NO. 2004 WAIRC 11363
_______________________________________________________________________________
Result Order issued
Representation
Applicant Ms M Ridley (of counsel) on behalf of the appellant
Respondent Mr R Bathurst (of counsel) on behalf of the respondent
_______________________________________________________________________________
Order
HAVING HEARD Mr R Bathurst (of counsel) for the Commissioner of Police and Ms M Ridley (of counsel) for the appellant in the matter of the application by the Commissioner of Police for leave to tender new evidence, the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to section 33R(2)(b) of the Police Act 1892 hereby grants leave for the following evidence to be tendered in Appeal No. 1721 of 2003:
(a) transcript of the criminal trial of the Appellant for assault occasioning bodily harm, heard on 15 September, 18 September, 19 September and 8 December 2003; and
(b) reasons of Magistrate Cullen, dated 10 December 2003, for convicting the Appellant of assault occasioning bodily harm.
FURTHRMORE pursuant to section 33S of the Police Act 1892 whereby the terms of section 35 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1979 have application, the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission determines that the reasons for decision in the determination of the application to grant leave to tender new evidence will be handed down the day after the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission has determined the appellants application for leave to tender new evidence. That matter will be heard at 4.30pm Thursday 6th May 2004.
The Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission will then consider whether, given that the hearing of the appeal pursuant to section 33Q of the Police Act 1892 has been set down to commence on 11th May 2004:
(i) there is sufficient opportunity for the appellant to consider the new evidence for which leave has been given to the Commissioner of Police to tender and for the appellant to tender new evidence in response to that new evidence pursuant to section 33R(5) of the Police Act 1892; and
(ii) any consideration which may arise as a consequence of the determination on Thursday 6th May of the appellant’s application for leave to tender new evidence pursuant to section 33R(3) of the Police Act 1892.
ON BEHALF OF THE
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION