Natalie Warnock -v- Director General, Department of Education

Document Type: Order

Matter Number: U 3/2025

Matter Description: Unfair Dismissal Application

Industry: Education

Jurisdiction: Single Commissioner

Member/Magistrate name: Commissioner C Tsang

Delivery Date: 7 Oct 2025

Result: Direction Issued

Citation: 2025 WAIRC 00838

WAIG Reference:

DOCX | 27kB
2025 WAIRC 00838
UNFAIR DISMISSAL APPLICATION
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

PARTIES NATALIE WARNOCK
APPLICANT
-V-
DIRECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
RESPONDENT
CORAM COMMISSIONER C TSANG
DATE TUESDAY, 7 OCTOBER 2025
FILE NO. U 3 OF 2025
CITATION NO. 2025 WAIRC 00838

Result Direction issued

Representation
APPLICANT MR C FOGLIANI (OF COUNSEL)

RESPONDENT MR M MCILWAINE (OF COUNSEL)


Direction

HAVING heard from Mr C Fogliani (of counsel) on behalf of the applicant and Mr M McIlwaine (of counsel) on behalf of the respondent, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred under the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA), and by consent, hereby directs –

1. THAT Trevor Stace have leave to give his evidence at the hearing via videolink.

2. THAT the applicant have leave to rely upon the expert report of Dr Ian Sherman dated 13 August 2025, marked as Annexure B and enclosed with her Form 1A – Application filed on 2 October 2025 (report), at the hearing of this matter.

3. THAT the report stand as Dr Sherman’s evidencein-chief and that Dr Sherman have leave to give his evidence at the hearing via videolink.

4. THAT the applicant have leave to rely upon the Applicant’s Amended Outline of Submissions, marked as Annexure A and enclosed with her Form 1A – Application filed on 2 October 2025, at the hearing of this matter.

5. THAT the respondent have leave to file, within two-weeks of the conclusion of the hearing of this matter, amended written submissions addressing the report and the Applicant’s Amended Outline of Submissions.

6. THAT the applicant have leave to file, within one week following the date of service of the respondent’s written submissions at Direction 4 above (respondent’s submissions), written submissions in reply addressing any matters raised in the respondent’s submissions that were not raised by the respondent in closing oral submissions at the hearing.





COMMISSIONER C TSANG
Natalie Warnock -v- Director General, Department of Education

UNFAIR DISMISSAL APPLICATION

WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

PARTIES Natalie Warnock

APPLICANT

-v-

Director General, Department of Education

RESPONDENT

CORAM Commissioner C Tsang

DATE TUESDAY, 7 October 2025

FILE NO. U 3 OF 2025

CITATION NO. 2025 WAIRC 00838

 

Result Direction issued

 


Representation 

Applicant Mr C Fogliani (of counsel)

 

Respondent Mr M McIlwaine (of counsel)

 

 

Direction

 

HAVING heard from Mr C Fogliani (of counsel) on behalf of the applicant and Mr M McIlwaine (of counsel) on behalf of the respondent, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred under the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA), and by consent, hereby directs –

 

1. THAT Trevor Stace have leave to give his evidence at the hearing via videolink.

 

2. THAT the applicant have leave to rely upon the expert report of Dr Ian Sherman dated 13 August 2025, marked as Annexure B and enclosed with her Form 1A – Application filed on 2 October 2025 (report), at the hearing of this matter.

 

3. THAT the report stand as Dr Sherman’s evidencein-chief and that Dr Sherman have leave to give his evidence at the hearing via videolink.

 

4. THAT the applicant have leave to rely upon the Applicant’s Amended Outline of Submissions, marked as Annexure A and enclosed with her Form 1A – Application filed on 2 October 2025, at the hearing of this matter.

 

5. THAT the respondent have leave to file, within two-weeks of the conclusion of the hearing of this matter, amended written submissions addressing the report and the Applicant’s Amended Outline of Submissions.

 

6. THAT the applicant have leave to file, within one week following the date of service of the respondent’s written submissions at Direction 4 above (respondent’s submissions), written submissions in reply addressing any matters raised in the respondent’s submissions that were not raised by the respondent in closing oral submissions at the hearing.

 

 

 

 

 

Commissioner C Tsang